Skip to main content

Researchers have issued warnings about social and psychological indicators in today’s USA that eerily echo those of the 1850s—a turbulent era preceding the American Civil War. While the prospect of another civil war seems remote, the current socio-political climate could usher in prolonged periods of social unrest and civil strife.

A significant event underscoring this tension was the January 6, 2021, storming of Capitol Hill, following President Donald Trump’s electoral defeat. This incident saw over 2,000 of his supporters forcefully breach the Capitol, engaging in acts of vandalism and menacing lawmakers. Some extremists even called for the assassination of Vice President Mike Pence and labeled officials as traitors.

For those intrigued by the historical parallels and socio-political dynamics described, a deeper exploration through relevant literature could be beneficial. Consider reading This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War by Drew Gilpin Faust, which provides an insightful analysis of how the Civil War fundamentally changed American society and perspectives on death and governance.

This assault resulted in casualties; a police officer and four rioters lost their lives, and later, four responding officers died by suicide.

Despite the severity, some leading conservative voices minimized these actions, describing the event as “largely peaceful” and akin to “a normal tourist visit.” This narrative was contradicted by claims of the rioters being peaceful patriots attacked by law enforcement. Such divergent views have fueled discussions about a potential “national divorce” between states of opposing political leanings, as posited by figures like Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Discussions about a potential civil war, using phrases like “if necessary,” have become increasingly common online among politicians and their supporters, hinting at the possibility of secession.

A team of U.S. academics has studied the social psychological landscape of today and its similarities to the 1850s, reaching a concerning conclusion: the risk of a new American Civil War, while still low, is growing more conceivable.

The Field of Blood: Violence in Congress and the Road to Civil War by Joanne B. Freeman offers a compelling look at the increasing violence and division within the U.S. Congress leading up to the Civil War, drawing stark comparisons to today’s political climate.

Their study states, “We aim to juxtapose the divisive climate before the Civil War with today’s hyper-partisan environment, illustrating significant parallels.” They continue, “However, there’s also evidence against the likelihood of outright civil war, secession, or violent coups. The 1850s may not predict our future, but they suggest that a long, bitter period of civil dysfunction could span generations without escalating to outright war.”

The researchers used a variant of social capital theory—typically a framework for examining positive social interactions—to explore the potential for negative outcomes like civil war. “Our analysis, grounded in social capital theory, compares past and present conditions to evaluate the likelihood of a full-scale civil war. The similarities are quite striking,” they noted.

The parallels identified include deep divisions over social values and norms, akin to the pre-Civil War era. Previously, issues like slavery, federal authority, tariff levels, and landowner benefits were contentious. Today, divisive topics include states’ rights, the separation of church and state, abortion, minority rights, gun ownership, immigration, and environmental policies.

For a comprehensive understanding of modern political polarization and its historical roots, Why We’re Polarized by Ezra Klein delves into the psychological and structural forces driving American political divisions, making it a crucial read for those following current events.

Additionally, a deep mistrust in political processes and opposition agendas mirrors the pre-war distrust that was particularly acute in the southern states. This mistrust now extends to the denial of election legitimacy and fears of an overpowering liberal agenda, perceived as threatening traditional values.

Other similarities include strong regional or group identities over national unity, selective trust in information sources, and a lack of bridging institutions to foster ideological cohesion, compounded by a perceived absence of reciprocity in political and social exchanges.

Lastly, for practical guidance in fostering dialogue and understanding in a polarized environment, Bridging the Partisan Divide: A Field Guide for the Politically Perplexed provides strategies and insights for navigating and mitigating conflicts in highly charged political contexts.

The study, published in the journal Administration & Society, does not forecast doom but underscores a probable scenario of enduring socio-political conflict that could deeply affect public administration and governance.

The researchers conclude, “History and social sciences provide us with patterns and probabilities but not precise predictions. Yet, a probabilistic approach, when well-researched, can be a useful tool. The data suggest that protracted conflicts, potentially lasting decades or generations, are almost inevitable, shaping the future trajectory of American society.”

If you want over 200+ ideas, phrases, and text messages to drive your man wild with desire for you, make sure to check out my new program, Language of Desire. I give you step-by-step instructions and tons of exact words to use to get exactly what you both want in and out of the bedroom.

P.S. The reason so many men “pull away” from women is because
women don’t understand this naughty secret about men. . .

Click here to find out more!