Chances are you probably haven’t heard of this study, even though it came out a while back. Carried out by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks this two-year study has me blown away.
Sure, we are all led to believe that a plane was to blame for the collapse of the twin towers but there is more to the story than that. Plane or no plane, this whole situation is fishy either way. Many people across the US and elsewhere believe that 9/11 was a false flag attack carried out by our government to push war and other things of the sort. While the events did occur the things going on or driving it all together are still not quite known.
Dr. Leroy Hulsey presented his findings back in 2017 (part of his 2-year study) and it was titled ‘A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7, September 2017 Progress Report.’ This detailed how his team was able to eliminate fire as the cause of the collapse. He says that there is no evidence of fire below floor seven. NIST only reported fired found on floors 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 19, 22, 29, and 30. Why is this? Dr. Hulsey and his team worked together to create an AutoCAD drawing that they used to basically make a virtual geography of the building itself through this they were able to make a lot of progress.
Now, if this building was not hit by a plane (it wasn’t) and the fires did not bring it down, what the hell did? Why did this building fall as well? These findings contradict findings presented by NIST.
You see, NIST claims the building collapsed due to fire because the fires caused thermal expansion of beams and girders that made up the steel frame supporting the structure. Also, while no exterior column deformation is evident in the actual collapse, deformation is seen in the NIST model, why is that? If you compare the two it is clear that the UAF’s research is much more accurate and in-depth than that of the NIST.
Hulsey’s states as follows clear as day during his presentation:
“So did WTC7 collapse from fires? Our study shows the fire is not the cause. I’m not going to tell you about what did it– I’m just going to tell you that it wasn’t that. … This contradicts findings presented by NIST.”
While you might think that this is not that important, it is. This is proof that something is being covered up and that the truth is not known. What do you think about all of this?
Image via Mint Press News