Have you ever gotten a painful flu shot, only to end up back in the doctor’s office within weeks, with a diagnoses of the flu? This is actually quite a bit more common than many would think, and after reading the fine print regarding the vaccine, it has become quite obvious as to why.
After hearing various reports that FluLaval had openly admitted that their shot was in no way effective for preventing the flu, I began checking things out for myself. Within merely a few click through the Google search engine, I stumbled almost immediately onto the Food and Drug administration’s approval letter for the vaccine. After reading two paragraphs, there it was, in plain text. According to the letter:
“Under this license, you are authorized to manufacture Influenza Virus Vaccine. You may label your Influenza Virus Vaccine with the proprietary name FluLaval™. FluLaval™ is indicated for active immunization of adults 18 years of age and older against influenza disease caused by influenza virus subtypes A and type B contained in the vaccine. This indication is based on immune response elicited by FluLaval™, and there have been no controlled trials demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FluLaval™. FluLaval™ is not indicated for use in children.”
Not only does it state quite clearly that no trials had been conducted in which a decrease in influenza had taken place. Furthermore, it also clearly states that the flu shot is not indicated for use in children, yet how many signs have we seen asking to bring our children into a local pharmacy or doctors office? To take it a step further, how many of us have actually had our local schools provide the flu shot to their children, in order to save us the trip?
And after peering through the drug facts portions of other websites, it only got worse. In a variety of scenarios, the flu shot could actually cause harmful effects far more devastating than the flu ever did. If by chance your system has a hypersensitivity to egg proteins, which does happen, you could encounter a life-threatening reaction. Yet, how many of us have been told this while getting the flu shot? Others encountered upper respiratory infections, arthralgia, myalgia, nasopharyngitis, back pain, diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and nasal congestion.
The adverse effects listed on the drug sheet found inside of the vaccine box even list a variety of horrible side effects.
- Eye pain and chest pain
- Dizziness, tremors and losing consciousness
- Convulsions and seizures
- Swelling of the brain
- Partial face paralysis
And this drug sheet proves to be much more comprehensive than ever imagined. Just go to your local pharmacy, and you can read the ingredients, warnings and other side effects. Included in the text, it states to NOT give to pregnant women, or children.
The ingredients are far worse, as even the CDC explains that aluminum, antibiotics, egg protein, formaldehyde, MSG, and thimerosal are contained inside of them.
In case you weren’t sure, thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vaccines to preserve them. However, mercury is an obviously toxic component that can lead to mercury poisoning, and far, far, worse.
Formaldehyde is described by the EPA as being:
“a colorless, flammable gas at room temperature and has a strong odor. Exposure to formaldehyde may cause adverse health effects.”
Yet, our government pushes this on EVERY citizen? To be injected into their bodies, to prevent the flu, based on NO scientific evidence?
So, on what basis are we pumping random chemicals into our veins, if no trials have been conducted to prove the efficacy of the shot? Furthermore, if the primary ingredients even were effective, could they not just skip the noxious gasses and chemicals? At least then, in the rare case that it could prevent the flu, we wouldn’t have to worry about dying from the variety of other illnesses and diseases caused by exposure to toxic chemicals.